> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This would give everyone access to the info (ok, the current > static methods are accessible as well) and imho makes it more > visible.
I think it'd make it less visible. For example, you can pass the CocoonContext only to specific components, while the statics are available everywhere. > Just curious, why do want to do this? Do you just want to use > the TreeProcessor as a processor for a custom XML? Or are you > using the TreeProcessor to process a sitemap in a different > environment? Now, I think, if the TreeProcessor is used for > custom XML, then you could use the TreeBuilder I think (I'm > not that sure). If you want to process a sitemap, you need > the dependency to the cocoon stuff anyway. I will process a reduced sitemap. Just generators, actions, transformers and serializers. Nothing more. In theory I could define my own pipeline language, write my own components, and so on, but I figured I'd try to re-use as much of Cocoon as possible. Specifically, I will not be using flow, continuations or subsitemaps. /LS
