I don't believe all apache projects are required to follow those voting procedures. However, I can't think of a good reason why not to. If someone is trusted enough to be a committer I would hope they would have the common sense to use their veto power judiciously.
Ralph -----Original Message----- From: Ugo Cei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] Make ProcessingException extend CascadingRuntimeException Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Ugo Cei wrote: > > > http://incubator.apache.org/learn/voting.html > Hmmm... "Under normal (non-lazy consensus) conditions, the proposal requires three positive votes and no negative ones in order to pass; [...] For code-modification votes, +1 votes are in favour of the proposal, but -1 votes are vetos and kill the proposal dead until all vetoers withdraw their -1 votes." Doesn't this apply to this vote? Ugo