Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Considering how discussion goes around this problem, I'm starting to > consider David's proposal
Sorry, what is David's proposal? Carsten
- Re: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-party snapshot... Ugo Cei
- RE: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-party snapshot... Carsten Ziegeler
- Re: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-party sna... Sylvain Wallez
- Re: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-party... Tim Larson
- RE: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-p... Carsten Ziegeler
- RE: [VOTE] preservation policy for thi... Antonio Gallardo
- RE: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-party... Carsten Ziegeler
- RE: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-p... Ralph Goers
- Cocoon is not gump! ( was RE: [VOTE] p... Antonio Gallardo
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! ( was RE:... Sylvain Wallez
- RE: Cocoon is not gump! ( was... Carsten Ziegeler
- RE: Cocoon is not gump! ( was... Carsten Ziegeler
- RE: Cocoon is not gump! ( was... Antonio Gallardo
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! ( was... Antonio Gallardo
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! ( was... Nicola Ken Barozzi
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! ( was... Antonio Gallardo
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! ( was... Sylvain Wallez
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! ( was... Ralph Goers
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! Stefano Mazzocchi
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! Ralph Goers
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! Pier Fumagalli
