On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:46:55AM +0000, Joerg Heinicke wrote: > Starting with the question: Does it make sense to process all sub bindings of a > UnionBinding? > > At the moment the UnionBinding behaves just like a ContextBinding, all sub > bindings are processed. While the processing of a UnionWidget depends on the > caseWidget the same is not true for the binding. > > My use case: I have different cases that need the same widget to be displayed > and later on saved back to bean. But the value is not saved to the bean only for > the current case but for all cases and so my case5 always wins, though another > case might have been selected. <snip example/> > The usage of voucherAvailable on the bean is exclusive, so I don't want to have > 5 fields were one would be sufficient. > > Was the UnionBinding implemented that way because nobody thought about my use > case or was there a use case for the current behaviour?
I do not have time to dig in the code right now, but this looks like a bug (oversight) that needs fixed. Only the current case should be processed. --Tim Larson
