On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 14:15, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> But let not implementation details (or technics) drive the syntax.
> It is more important to have a good sitemap language than to have
> a clean and small implementation.
I agree too mate.
Something that I'm wondering about is what the relationship would be
between flowscript and sitemap-script if we allowed the sitemap to be
scriptable.
My first impression would be that the 2 would merge - the temptation
would be there for our users to write their flowscript around their
sitemap definition (good thing or bad thing?)
The XML syntax prevents keeps flow and sitemaps separate - perhaps its
worth working out the relationship between both concepts?
Cheers,
Marcus
--
.....
,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter
;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer
$: $$$$: ManageSoft Corporation
$ o_)$$$: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
;$, _/\ &&:'
' /( &&&
\_&&&&'
&&&&.
&&&&&&&:
