Steven Noels dijo: > On 09 Aug 2004, at 21:53, Leszek Gawron wrote: > >> Let's imagine we base cocoon on spring. There was a discussion about >> including hibernate in cocoon and it failed (licensing). Spring being >> ASL 2.0 ships with hibernate library, even if not - it contains code >> that was compiled against hibernate interfaces. Wouldn't this be an >> issue? > > Before anyone makes the obligatory remark license discussions are > boring, let's just not forget what Debian has been doing in this field > since many years - http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/ > > Granted, the number of license discussions has been increasing over the > past year(s), but if they can cope, so should we. It is the crux of the > contract we provide to our users.
A mail list for that is good idea, I think a better idea is to state clear in a web page what kind of licenses are valid for us -> this will avoid further discussions.... And for the LGPL case I prefer to be safe than sorry. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.
