I think that client-side validation is a very common use case. I'm writing a XSL to apply in the pipeline just after the cform generation.
If anyone want client-side validation (always in adding to the server-side validation and never in place of) just insert a transformer specifyng the XSL and some optional parameters. bye, Luca Garulli www.Pro-Netics.com (member of Orixo.com - The XML business alliance) OrienTechnologies.com - Light ODBMS, All in one JDO solution On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:42:33 +0100, Guido Casper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > > Le 23 nov. 04, � 10:53, oceatoon a �crit : > > > >> ...Is different JS really coded for different browsers? I thought > >> there were > >> only those with JS and those without, in the second case validation would > >> go back to Server Side but no different version of scripts... > > > > > > your (future) client might *not* even be a browser per se. Think Flash, > > XUL, and related stuff. > > This may be a little off topic and I'm asking out of curiosity what > others think. But I wonder if flow (and continuations in particular) and > cforms really is an appropriate technology for "rich" (and potentially > stateful) clients? > > Guido
