Leszek Gawron wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
But the Dreamweaver usecase is a valid one (It was me who started a
discussion about this in May after attenting a Tapestry seminar at a
conference) and so we should support it.
Now, having them cohexist in the page smells like FS, though ;-)
Can't agree more.
What would you do then if you started simple (with attributes) and found
out after a while (when the template is already quite big) that you need
a tag syntax in some places?
You come back here and ask for that feature.
Clean design rule #1: avoid YAGNI.
--
Stefano.
