On Mie, 8 de Diciembre de 2004, 12:52, Reinhard Poetz dijo:
> AFAIK there was no official vote but I found these mails by Carsten and > Sylvain: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=109681547626264&w=2
Have I missed the vote?
I don't wrote this ;-)
maybe my second ego (I think Bertrand already got acquainted with him ...) ;-)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107821710911262&w=2
Follow the thread and seems we had an agreement. :-D
Here the missing summary:
+1 : Antonio, Stefano, Unico, Bruno -0.5: Ugo, Jörg, Leo (nb), Reinhard, Pier
People who voted with -0.5 were not against 1.4 but said that this really needs a good usecase that can only be implemented (easily) with 1.4 and not with 1.3.
Not to end in a chicken-egg-situation, we agreed that 1.4 is the minimum for 2.2 for now. When we are ready to release Cocoon 2.2 we will look through the code of Cocoon _core_ and if there is no major blocker we will support 1.3 again, if this is not possible, 1.4 will remain the minimum.
-- Reinhard
