Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:

Is there any technical reason to switch from the Avalon Logger
abstraction?



No.



Well ...then that's no good reason to me.

Rather I would also import the few classes
into out repository (like we did with ECM)
than doing the switch.

We can't import the classes in this case as these are interfaces. For ECM we could provide our own implementation, but - for now - we are still using the interfaces of the avalon framework. We agreed to move away someday from these interfaces - and part of this logging discussion is exactly about this: moving away from the avalon interfaces.

Carsten, too early. Now that avalon is closed, nobody is going to modify those classes in a non-compatible way.


There is *less* to worry about now than in the past.

Let's try to act rationally people, if ain't broken, don't try to fix it.

--
Stefano.



Reply via email to