On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:28:06 -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip/> > > > > Forrest is doing it for docs... someone else can do it for apps :-) > > See? the problem is that you are partitioning the matching space with > URL matchers... I strongly feel that most of the problems that Daniel > (and you) are outlining will just go away if you used non-URL matchers. Although I agree that 90% of the problem seems to be a matcher issue I've got to ask; what would the matchers be matching on if it's not a URL? I have a couple answers, but I'd like other opinions... It seems to me that Daniel might be coming at this from a mostly application POV. If so, for such cases, I think you can't _always_ be quite as dogmatic about how a URL is structured; for many apps there's little to no exectation of long term URI persistance/repeatability. -- Peter Hunsberger (Won't be able to respond untili Wed.)
