Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
I personally would remove this syntactic sugar completly; it's imho
not intuitiv what it means and the inconsistent implementation adds to
it.
In addition it would make our unified object model implementation (for
flow, jxtg etc.) much easier as we don't have to simulate this in Java.
Unfortunately, I fear that this is common use, so let's deprecate it
with 2.1.x and remove for 2.2 completly
agree :-)
We have the same functionality in flow, e.g. you can get the value of a
widget using the model with "model.WIDGETID". I think we should
deprecate (and remove) this as well.
Can you start a formal vote about it?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
