On 13 Feb 2005, at 15:39, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
There is one question we have to ask ourselves: what is the target release for real blocks? I think we agreed that it is *not* 2.2, so I'm not sure if we should introduce the blocks.xml in 2.2. I see the potential danger that this is a signal to introduce blocks in 2.2 already and then this might delay a first release of 2.2 for a long time.
Nah, I wouldn't feel they're an appropriate target for 2.2. IMVHO there's still a _lot_ to think about the structure of "real" blocks and how that impacts cocoon....
Being (probably) the only user of the kernel ATM, there are still several issues that personally I feel must be fixed, in the core of the idea of blocks themselves... I can't yet quite put my finger on what's wrong, but definitely there is something in the current code I don't like, something structurally flawed...
But that's only my 0.02 �...
Pier
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
