Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
...
I'd like to hear why you think cforms should not be a block.

Because having it as a block makes it really hard to answer the question: what is cocoon and what does it provide me.

Hmmm...

I think it's useful to have a list of things that cocoon comes with and a form handling framework is something that *must* be part of the core.

Code-wise, putting cforms in the same java build of the cocoon core is wrong, as it does not enforce proper layering. I mean, the Cocoon core should not depend on cforms, /code-wise/.


So, from this POV, cforms should still be a separate compilation step after the cocoon core; this does not mean that it has to be a block.

It's not the first time that we come up with the need of a separate compilation step without making it a block (remember the "module"s?).

--
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            - verba volant, scripta manent -
   (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to