Re: [Poll] JXTG vs. CForms

[Ralph Goers]

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
But the other valid point remains: the syntax. Now, what about:
${cocoon.session.attributes.user.id} ?
Carsten
That's OK, but does that seems somewhat problematic. Does that mean 
that the code will search for a getXXX method (in this case 
getAttributes - Oh but it is getAttribute, not getAttributes) and 
when it finds it takes an argument it just uses the next field?  Or 
is it just hard-coded to know that "attributes" is special?

Don't know :) Whatever is easier to understand and implement - I guess 
hard-code is easier?

I guess that's where I'm having a problem. From your example I presume 
"user" is an object that contains a getId() method? If "user" is an 
object that contains a Map would that also be accessed by
${cocoon.session.attributes.user.attributes.id}  ?

Or am I going further than what is supported?
Ralph