Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > Whenever I work as trainer or consultant and Cocoon is the subject, people > always ask me the same questions about maturity and community of Cocoon and > its blocks. We should tell our users clearly what *we* consider as > "supported", "deprecated" and "committed" and then everybody can decide > himself what he does with this information. > > The wiki page is only an indicator which should help us to decide to get an > answer on the community aspect which is one part of the answer which state > a block has (the others are interface stability, implementation stability > and available automated tests).
The things that disturb me are the name "supported" and the list of committers. Perhaps we should remove that Wiki page once the "job" is done. > Additionally I like Bertrands idea of a more verbose description of a block > status, that could be part of every block documentation (see > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=111096531612907&w=2 for > details). Agreed. --David
