Pier Fumagalli wrote:
The only problem I have with "block:super://blah.xml" is that "//" in an URI indicates the start of the authority part, and this is defined as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port", and no matter how you see it, "block:...anything..." _is_ a URI, and thus should follow its spec...
Pier
--- o0o ---
As all URI discussions tend to provoke strong feelings for Stefano, it's best to say directly that this question is not important enough for me to fight about ;)
Despite dry humor, I have no problems deprecating the use of // in the cocoon: and block: URI scheme.
-- Stefano.
