On Sab, 9 de Abril de 2005, 14:27, Jochen Kuhnle dijo: > Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09.04.2005 20:51:41: >> >> In other words, should it be: >> >> <map:mount src="foo/bar/" context="baz"/> >> and >> <map:sitemap> >> >> or >> <map:mount src="foo/bar/"/> >> and >> <map:sitemap context="baz"/> >> >> >> My feeling favors the second form, as allowing to specify the context >> externally means that understanding what a sitemap does depends on the >> mount statement. > > Agreed, the second form is easier to understand. The first one was just > easier to implement (at least for me), since MountNode.invoke already > resolves the sitemap context. And this was the point where cocoon went > into endless recursion... > > On the other hand, the first form offers one additional feature: Mounting > the same sitemap twice with different contexts. I just don't know yet if > this is a good idea... >
I see this as a good idea. I have a lot of literally equals sitemaps that with something like that I can get rid of them by just defining his context. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.
