Ugo Cei wrote: > Il giorno 30/mag/05, alle 16:57, Bertrand Delacretaz ha scritto: > > >>Le 30 mai 05, � 16:53, Carsten Ziegeler a �crit : >> >>>...So, we could also *always* set the content length if the pipeline >>>buffers by itself. WDYT?.. >> >>Didn't know about that, but it makes sense as we get Content-Length >>for free then. >> >>Ugo, I hope you'll also write tests if you implement this, it's real >>easy with the new HmltUnit-based framework ;-) > > > Well, I could go the easy route and add a configurable parameter. That > would be a piece of cake. > > Or I could follow Carsten's suggestion, but for that I need to deepen > my knowledge of pipeline machinery. > > I'll see if I can find some time to do it the right way. > I can have a look at it in the next days if you want.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
