On 5/31/05, Daniel Fagerstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BURGHARD �ric wrote: > > Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > > > >>If you want to help making JXTG faster you need to submit more > >>information. We need examples that reproduce this behaviour with the > >>JXTG template and the corresponding XSLT. We also need to know exactly > >>what version of 2.2 you used. How did you measure preformance? Profiling > >>info is rather helpful > >>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=111625859100003&r=1&w=2. > >> > > I apologize. > > No problem, these performance issues is always a little bit touchy ;) >
It should probably be pointed out that other people have found that the latest releases of Saxon 8 are significantly faster than previous versions of Saxon (and it was already faster than many processors). We've seen much better preformance for some of our stuff. So, much of this might be a Saxon issue and not JXTG/Cocoon issue... <snip/> -- Peter Hunsberger
