Glen Ezkovich wrote: > > The fix appears easy, but is something broken? Has someone expressed > the desire to use two languages in a single sitemap or is this just > an instance of feature creep? I tend to agree, so I think we should for now just forbid to write different map:flow sections in a single sitemap (by different I mean that they use a different interpreter). If someone wants to use more than one language we can add that easily.
> My fear is that this may lead to > conflicts in function naming that we will need to resolve in the > future. > On the other hand your proposal for a SitemapEnvironment > object seems like a smart refactoring. Ok :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
