Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's >>the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time. > > > Hmm, so why don't you realize that you have a typo in it for many > days? Like when you rename a jar but forget to update the descriptor?
because cocoon doesn't use *all* of that data, only parts. Truth be told, cocoon could have two files, one for gump and one for its own build system, but they would contain the same information. >>Now, I would be totally in favor of granting the gump committers >>commit access to the cocoon project. > > > Should be quite trivial to add a rule to asf-authorization that grants > rw to @gump for just that file, at least I think it allows > file-granularity. Even better. Can we do it or is it something that infra@ has to do? -- Stefano.
