Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
>> Maybe I should just shut up and let Daniel
>> continue with his awesome job ...but (there
>> is always a but)
>
> I hope that you and everyone else speaks up and rise your concerns if
> you have any.
In theory, in a perfect world, with all the time and will, with plenty
of developers... I would have Torsten's same concerns.
> We need community involvement in this area sooner rather than later
> if we really want real blocks.
In practice, we *desperately* need real blocks if we want to go ahead.
This is much more important than any lock-in on another container.
...
> TBH, we have discussed containers for years, forked Cocoon a couple of
> times and Pier have even implemented an own kernel, without getting that
> much closer to real blocks. And today we have fewer active developers
> with container implementation competence and interest than we had a year
> or two ago.
I agree in full.
Overall, OSGI seems the best bet ATM, since Eclipse will remain for
years, and presumably will not change framework soon.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
