Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 25 juil. 05, à 12:20, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
Hmm, I'm a little bit confused if I compare the two response quoted
below.
I personally would prefer to go the block.xml way and create OSGi
manifests and whatever out of it. With that approach we are still
independent from OSGi...
From the discussions last week with Reinhard, Daniel and Upayavira I
think using block.xml to generate everything else was the consensus. See
"role of block.xml" in http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/Blockathon2005Report
Hmm, was I really part of that concensus? Like Sylvain I prefer to use
the OSGi manifest for everything that can be described by that and the
block.xml for the rest.
Now, IIUC, the rest of you think that such a solution would be
unpractical because of overlap with gump, compile and deploy time
dependency descriptors etc. You might very well be right about that, but
I prefer to wait and see until we actually start to implement it before
we decide.
/Daniel
