Guys, On 8/12/05, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It isn't intended for public consumption. It is intended as a backend > system. So, we might publish it on some dev site, but not on the public > site - in time, the content of the Daisy site should be uploaded to the > public site.
On 8/12/05, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daisy is to edit website content, it still will be published to the main > cocoon.apache.org website - at least, that's the intention. Then let's tackle two problems at once by moving the current website content into Daisy (Bruno has already done most of it) and, after reviewing the current pages, produce a new version of the website through the use of Ross' Daisy-to-Forrest component (if that is more workable than the current procedure as updated on the wiki by Vadim) and repeat this process more frequently than now (maybe once a month, or after a certain number of modifications in Daisy). OTOH I don't see why Daisy should be "hidden" from the general user population. I myself rather see documentation in progress than static, incomplete documentation. The only "warning" we should put up is that it's subject to change, both content and outline. However, the search is very good, so it is very likely people will find what they are looking for. -- Bye, hepabolu
