hepabolu wrote:
Guys,

I don't know if a vote for this is required, but I'd like to have consensus/feedback, before I do something drastic.

As written earlier today there are gaps in the current version of the website, e.g. FAQs are missing. What I'd like to do is restore the current content of the website ASAP, BUT using Daisy as the source.
This comes down to the following steps:

- compare current Daisy content with counterparts in SVN BRANCH and update Daisy accordingly (I'll do this) - update Daisy with missing content (i.e. the missing pages from the website) (me)
- do a Daisy-to-Forrest export (Ross?)
- update the website as described on the wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonWebsiteUpdate)
Note: all stays as it is now, navigation, content etc.
- when the website is correctly generated:
  - remove all documentation from BRANCH (me)
  - remove all identical pages from TRUNK (me)
- move all remaining documentation pages from TRUNK to Daisy, marking them for TRUNK

WDYT?

I should have read this before sending my last email :-(

Yes, I agree. However, as I said, I'm pretty sure you'll find that 2.1 and Trunk are the identical, from a content perspective.

So yes, get the content across into Daisy, get Forrest working, get the sites published, then start improving documentation piecemeal.

NB. Don't forget about the generic site, that needs to be done too.

Regards, Upayavira

Reply via email to