Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Le 30 août 05, à 13:38, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : > > > I see your point - but I'm not too sure about the "motivating people by > breaking the build" bit. > I'm not sure either, but it could be ;) In general, people start to get involved into open source more easily if something is not working as expected. As soon as you have a perfect open source project, noone is really interested in changing things.
> We seem to have fairly little collective energy at the moment [1], so > it might be wiser to make sure there is enough energy to complete the > job (or at least bring things to an usable state again) in a reasonable > timeframe before breaking things. > The advantage is that 2.2 is not really used anyway, so 2.1.x is still working - I know that this argument is against the argument from above (if noone is using 2.2 noone will be motivated etc.) Now I think I have some energy to spend on this subject, but I want only spend as much energy as needed - and not more. So directly doing stuff on the trunk reduces the energy needed to get it done :) Anyways, I will try to come up with a status and todo stuff asap. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
