Upayavira wrote:


I couldn't agree more. Personally I'd be -1 on porting ECM++ back to 2.1.x. 2.1.x should be a _maintenance_ branch, and unless we can focus on getting 2.2 out in some form, we risk some serious geopardy for our community, I think.

So, let's release 2.2, make that the main branch, and start adding OSGi, Maven, etc, into 2.3. \

I really think we should get into the mindset that the branch with real blocks and OSGi will be 3.0.


With Carsten's proposal to release every two months, we're almost back into release early, release often, but, problem is, we'd be releasing a branch often, which is seriously broken, IMO.

I'd say, let's release 2.2M1 at the same time as 2.1.8, say, just after the GetTogether.

+1 - If Carsten (or whomever) can move ECM++ by then.


Regards, Upayavira

Ralph

Reply via email to