Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz <at> apache.org> writes:
I don't think we'll ever get there, my last count says we have 303 open
bugzilla issues, and my perception is that we have little collective
energy to analyze and prioritize them, we've been chasing this for
months now without significant results.
How about doing a "bug amnesty" as follows?
I don't like the idea of a general amnesty. Really many bugs are only about
enhancements or provide at least patches. IMO it can give a bad impression to
the community if we just ignore these issues.
But I like the idea of an EXPIRED state. This applied *by hand* on the bugs is
not that disruptive.
I will add, lets define a policy. for example:
If a bug was marked as "NEEDINFO" and the user does not provided more
info in 2-3 months, then mark the bug as expired and close the bug. I
think there are already some candidates to be expired.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Jörg
PS:
Is there again a problem known to infrastructure? I can not send any email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via POP3 and GMX, but have to use Gmane for it:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.gmx.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[email protected]>:
140.211.166.49_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_550_
http://dsbl.org/listing?213.165.64.20/Giving_up_on_140.211.166.49./
