Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Oh yes, sure! > > Something I'm worried a bit about though, is the naming of these > parameters in web.xml if we want to keep compatibility with the existing > parameter names. The new property stuff uses fully-qualified names, > which is very good, whereas the servlet parameters have no prefix. > > Or maybe when we search for a given property, we should have a > double-lookup in web.xml: > - lookup the property as is (allows for fully qualified names in web.xml) > - if the property name starts with "org.apache.cocoon", lookup the > property with this prefix stripped. > Or we could add a parameter from web.xml twice: once as is and if the prefix is missing, we add the fully qualified property as well. So we have a single lookup.
> That way, we use fully qualified names everywhere in the code, and > property files, but still ensure backwards compatibility with the > current web.xml. > Yeap, good idea. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
