Re: [heads-up] old Cocoon bugzilla is not yet closed (Was: [Bug 36810])

[Pier Fumagalli]

On 31 Oct 2005, at 08:01, David Crossley wrote:

Youch, i presumed that when we moved to Jira that
the old Bugzilla would be closed and people would
need to look for our issues.apache.org/jira

This old issue was able to be re-opened and commented.

I've asked infrastructure.

    Pier

You can't _really_ lock down bugzilla... you can't now enter new issues, but apparently people can reopen or comment the old ones...

-David

On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:41:43AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36810>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36810


completely different.

------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-31 08:41 ------- I'm not sure what the bug is in Forest, but I doubt it depends on #32360. JXPath was working correctly (at least until it was broken while someone mistakenly "fixed" 32360). There might be some problem in how Forest's XPath expressions are designed to handle the default namespace, or it might be something

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature