On 05.11.2005 08:46, Sylvain Wallez wrote:

So let's make other proposals. Let's consider wiget "foo.bar" (e.g. a fd:field in a fd:group) and the ID of its <input>. - "foo.bar..input": the '.' is doubled, which can never conflict with a widget's full name - "foo.bar._input": generated element's name starts with a character that we can forbid as the first character of widget names

I prefer the first one (double '.') which is IMO more readable than the second.

Another one, which looks more natural: "foo.bar.input.": the trailing '.' ensures it cannot conflict with a widget's full name

I definitely prefer the ones which can not conflict with other widget's full name instead of forbidding another character. Your last proposal with trailing dot is the one I like most.

Jörg

Reply via email to