Jorg Heymans wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > >>We can do this ourselves I think - the best (but most time consuming)way >>would imho be to convert excalibur to use maven 2. >> > > > Well, the poms are partially converted so that's a big part done > already. Provided the repository is somewhat properly organized, going > through the poms and stripping them of unnecessary cruft shouldn't take > too long - even though it's utterly boring! > :) But these are the low hanging fruits most people are waiting for, or? ;)
> Is excalibur still being developed? Last svn commit seemed to be 3 days ago. > Yes; it's not that active anymore but from time to time minor features or bug fixes are added. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
