Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Le 13 févr. 06, à 14:50, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : > >> Giacomo Pati wrote: >> >>> ...What about also getting rid of logkit and use what we already have in >>> our dependency lists (log4J, commons-logging, ...)? >>> >> Yes, please :) I would suggest log4j as commons-logging has problems >> with classloading (afair) and noone is using jdk14 logging.... > > > +1 for log4j
+1 too. Upayavira
