Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > Could the compromise be that the 'release' == 'alpha/beta/grokmake' with the > README listing '* Examples a,b,c not working,' ?? > Ok, perhaps my wording was not the best :) Of course the samples are not working, but this is a hint that the technology used by the samples is not working and not the sample by itself. So releasing in this state means not only that samples are not working but also core functionality. And the biggest block here is the template block.
> Striving for perfection before action, is a paradox as perfection can only be > obtained by fine-tuning the action. :) > > I would +1 a improved release every week. Small steps. Little to consider. > Fast Forward. Done, Next!, Done! ... Anybody still around from the Cocoon 1.0 > times ?? If we have fixed the starting problems mentioned above, then we can release every day if we want and incrementally fix things (though I'm concerned by the implications wrt. legal oversight etc.). So, let's just fix the worst things and release :) I'm currently looking into the template block... Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
