Ok, but you guys still need to fix: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/legal/rhino1.5r4-continuations-R26.jar.license.txt and http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk/commons/legal/src/main/resources/rhino-1.6R2.jar.license.txt
And does the user get an notification when Rhino is downloaded through Maven as required by http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html#options-inproduct? On 27.10.2006 17:11:24 Ralph Goers wrote: > This may not be too big a deal for Cocoon trunk. So long as flowscript > is an optional part of Cocoon I believe we are OK. However, it probably > also means that while other blocks can take advantage of flowscript they > shouldn't rely on it. > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > Hi Cocooners > > > > Before I start: Sorry to be a PITA to bring up Rhino again. ;-) > > > > Batik is starting to plan a new release and Rhino popped up in the back > > of my mind. I went looking in your codebase to see what you did with > > Rhino since I last checked. Turns out that Cocoon still lists Rhino as > > under the MPL 1.1 in both Trunk and the 2.1.x branch. And that's clearly > > wrong: > > http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/download.html > > http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/js/rhino/src/org/mozilla/javascript/Script.java > > > > And as you know this whole thing is further complicated by the fact that > > the NPL is currently de-facto an excluded license which means that > > neither Cocoon nor Batik are allowed to distribute or simply download > > (through Maven without alerting the user) Rhino. > > http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html#transition-examples-npl > > > > Means both our projects would actually have to remove Rhino and make > > sure they run without it. > > http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html#options > > > > Cliff wrote about certain options in March on legal-discuss (Message-ID: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). Nobody > > followed up on that. And it looks like both our projects have ignored > > the third-party licence policy so far concerning this issue. Any ideas > > how to proceed? Shall we raise it again on legal-discuss? Has there been > > any progress in trying to convinve the Rhino project to switch to the > > MPL? > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > > Jeremias Maerki
