Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > AFAIK these features were never explicitely mentioned in our docs, so > not official, and thus certainly not widely used. It may be worth it to > be legally clean at the price of very few compatibility problems. > Yepp, I think being legally clean is more important here. If we don't go this way, we have to find a way to support the old version without *ever* going into legal problems (e.g. by separating flow from the core in 2.1.x and make it available separately etc.) This would cause pain to *all* Cocoon users.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
