Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko escribió:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Perhaps we should rethink this "drop jdk1.3 support" stuff, remove the
comment from the status file and get 2.1.10 out.
get 2.1.10 out, close 2.1.x branch, and work on getting 2.2 out - i'm
completely +1 on this line of thinking. Why do we need to keep on
dragging 2.1.x branch forward? Just say that 2.1.10 is last on jdk 1.3
(and last of 2.1.x), and 2.2 forward requires jdk 1.4.
Well looking at the release cycle of the last 2 versions ,which was
2.1.9 in april 2006 and 2.1.8 in november 2005, I guess another
five-eight months to get 2.2 out should be feasable. So it makes sence
that we should stop the 2.1.x branch and move on to 2.2.
So here is my (non-binding) +1.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Reijn
