Joerg Heinicke wrote: > On 22.05.2007 07:10, Giacomo Pati wrote: > >>> 1. Could you please provide links to the thread discussing applied >>> changes? It really helps to understand these changes 2 months later. >> >> Well, the changes are freshly discussed (not 2 month later). > > I guess it's meant the other way around: What's known in 2 months (or > thereafter) when somebody has a look on the code/commit message? It was a silly language mistake that did not show my intention.
Thanks Joerg for explaining it. -- Grzegorz Kossakowski
