Grzegorz Kossakowski schrieb: > Felix Knecht pisze: >> >> Do you think its worth to write such a bridge? Avalon is dead >> (http://avalon.apache.org/closed.html) and c22 is now spring based. >> Wouldn't it be a better solution migrate the db-stuff to spring and >> therefore force the user to migrate his own components as well? In c22 a >> lot has changed (e.g. forms). An c21 'block' will not run anyway just >> putting it into c22. Adaptions need to be done. > > I don't want to support dead Avalon, I want to support Cocoon's > components that still depend on Avalon and its DataSource managment. I > know that blocks from C2.1 will not work in C2.2 but we have > components in C2.2 (like SQLTransformer) that still obtain sql > connection through DataSource interfaces. I have not done in-depth > analysis but my rough guess is that _all_ samples in C2.2 that need > database access still depend on old approach. > > If writing such a bridge would be quite easy I think its worth the > effort to make all samples and components working again right away. >
I see the point, but wouldn't this give a wrong idea to new c22 users on how to do it? Wouldn't it be better to put our efforts in migrating the samples? WDYT?
