Reinhard Poetz pisze: >> Since this dependencies are not on central repository, shouldn't they >> be defined as provided, or so? > > definitly, but it shouldn't be us to fix this in our pom. It's still a > PITA that dependencies are not checked if they really exist when > things are deployed to the central repository. *sigh*
I agree that such check would help with silly mistakes and proper Maven evangelizing but the fault is always on log4j team for broken release. POM is part of release and there is no excuse! :-) > Since we can probably leave out this release and wait for one with > correct dependencies, I set the version of log4j to 1.2.14 again. I think we should report this problem to log4j community. > (BTW, great to have Continuuum running again!) Yes, but it's not always working properly, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1316 As soon as this issue is resolved I will be fully satisfied with our Continuuum instance. -- Grzegorz Kossakowski http://reflectingonthevicissitudes.wordpress.com/
