[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12524400
 ] 

Ralph Goers commented on COCOON-1765:
-------------------------------------

I don't care what is used as long as it is an interface that can have any 
implementation (including a proprietary logging framework) plugged in.

> Logging
> -------
>
>                 Key: COCOON-1765
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1765
>             Project: Cocoon
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: - OSGi integration
>            Reporter: Reinhard Poetz
>
> [...] But my main thoughts is that logging need to be a centralized service, 
> common for all blocks (separate logging solutions for each block would be a 
> pain).
> The logging implementation is contained in a block (that is installed early) 
> and makes the logger available as a service that other block can get through 
> the service manager. This way the logging implementation is chosen by the 
> choice of logging block. Observe that I only is talking about the blocks fw, 
> within a block an ordinary ECM can be set up and it will inject the logger in 
> its managed objects through the usual Avalon style.
> Using the same logger interface everywhere is also practical I guess we 
> continue to use the o.a.avalon.framework.logger.Logger one. 
> (by Daniel Fagerstrom: 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=113889468124728&w=2)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to