Ralph Goers wrote:
Thanks Carsten.
I don't get the last paragraph though. Why would we provide more
information about 2.1.10 when the announcement is for 2.1.11? The
changes.html link has almost nothing under 2.1.11 so I assume the
reference to 2.1.10 is correct?
No, that's a typo - the announcement is hand prepared and I oversaw the
version number at the bottom.
For the changes.html I have no idea how to update them. If someone could
have a look at it, would be great!
Thanks
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
