On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just started with looking closer at the pipeline stuff we have for c3 > atm. My first impression was that there are too many interfaces which > might confuse users :) As we step away from just a sax based pipeline, I > fear we really might need all these interfaces :( > > The other thing is caching: i guess in many scenarios caching is not > done on the pipeline or even pipeline component level. So I think we > should try to make caching more optional - I know that it is optional > from a feature point but I would like to have the pipeline jar as small > as possible and move the caching stuff into an optional/additional lib. > I have no good idea atm how to do this as the pipeline components itself > need to be aware of caching. But perhaps someone else has?
Sounds like a perfect opportunity for some Aspect Oriented coding........ ;-) -- Peter Hunsberger
