Looking further into it I found that defining a separate "XSLT processor" allows me to use the STX transformer:
in META-INF/cocoon/avalan/cocoon-core-xslt-stx.xconf I now have: <components> <component role="org.apache.excalibur.xml.xslt.XSLTProcessor/stx" class="org.apache.cocoon.components.xslt.TraxProcessor"> <parameter name="transformer-factory" value="net.sf.joost.trax.TransformerFactoryImpl"/> </component> </components> and in META-INF/cocoon/avalan/sitemap-transformers-stx-tansformer.xconf I have: <map:components xmlns:map="http://apache.org/cocoon/sitemap/1.0"> <map:transformers> <map:transformer name="stx" src="org.apache.cocoon.transformation.TraxTransformer"> <xslt-processor-role>stx</xslt-processor-role> </map:transformer> </map:transformers> </map:components> and it works! Excellent! So I answered my own question. I always have the same thing with directions as well: the moment I ask for directions, I'm almost there ;-). Huib Verweij. Op 30 jan 2011, om 12:59 heeft Huib Verweij het volgende geschreven: > Hi, > > I'd like to use the STX block in Cocoon 2.2, but it doesn't work, I get the > same error as mentioned here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cocoon.apache.org/msg52324.html ("stylesheet > requires attribute version"). > > I think the problem is in the TraxTransformer that no longer supports the > "transformer-factory" config option (the Cocoon 2.1.11 version does).In the > stx block the stx transformer is declared like this: > > <map:transformer name="stx" > logger="sitemap.transformer.stx" > src="org.apache.cocoon.transformation.TraxTransformer"> > > <transformer-factory>net.sf.joost.trax.TransformerFactoryImpl</transformer-factory> > </map:transformer> > > so it is using the "transformer-factory" config option. So what happens is, I > think, the default transformer factory for XSLT stylesheets is used, it > generates a transformer, which is a XSLT transformer, which checks for the > version attribute on the <xsl:stylesheet/> element, which does not exist in > the STX stylesheet, and it generates the above error. Or something like that. > > So, do you have any tips on how to get this working again? > > Huib Verweij. >