Hi all, the Apache Cocoon 3.0.0-alpha-3 vote passed with four +1, no +/-0, no -1. Votes have been expressed by following people:
Simone Tripodi * Franchesco Chicchiriccò * Reinhard Poetz * David Crossley * no other votes have been expressed. Thanks everybody who took part to the review, I'll proceed now to the second part of the release. Have a nice day, all the best! Simo (*) binding vote http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi David, > OK, thanks! Anyway I re-uploaded the md5/sha1 files without the -n prefix :P > Thanks once again, > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:56 AM, David Crossley <cross...@apache.org> wrote: >> Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> Hi David!!! >>> thanks a lot for your review, I'll work on the problems you notified >>> before declaring the vote passed! >> >> Well it does not need to be done at this stage if >> it receives sufficient votes. >> >> In my opinion these issue can wait until the next >> release cycle. >> >> -David >> >>> David Crossley wrote: >>> > Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> >> Hi again, >>> >> just to make sure everybody tests the same stuff, please refer to: >>> >> >>> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/cocoon/org/apache/cocoon/all/cocoon-all/3.0.0-alpha-3/cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.tar.gz* >>> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/cocoon/org/apache/cocoon/all/cocoon-all/3.0.0-alpha-3/cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.zip* >>> >> >>> >> Include GPG key and checksum verification!!! >>> > >>> > Thanks Simone. >>> > >>> > +1 from me. >>> > >>> > MD5 (cocoon-all-3.0.0-alpha-3-dist.tar.gz) = >>> > 5b2e839101ec53246690b05dbf136b13 >>> > >>> > There are a couple of things that should get fixed >>> > for next time: >>> > >>> > The md5 and sha1 files have extra "-n". >>> > >>> > All NOTICE.txt files have a year range, so needs 2011. >>> > >>> > >>> > I don't understand how Maven stuff works. There are some >>> > declared dependencies. They do use suitable licenses. >>> > Do we need to add a copy of their licenses in our distribution? >>> > >>> > e.g. some are: >>> > AspectJ : EPL-1.0 >>> > Woodstox : Apache License 2.0 >>> > Antlr : BSD >>> > MurmurHash : Apache License 2.0 >>> > >>> > Some of those licenses do require reciprocity: >>> > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b >>> > e.g. >>> > We already have mentioned in NOTICE.txt the JAXB using CDDL. >>> > >>> > However we have not mentioned AspectJ using EPL. >>> > >>> > We do mention Java MurmurHash using AL-20 and the original >>> > using MIT, but we do not need to. >>> > >>> > -David >>> > >>> > >> >
