I'd also rather go with porting to Git as next step.
Besides, this seems a necessary prerequisite to revive the community
since it reduces the hurdle to get people involved.
Jörg
On 23.01.24 17:54, Christofer Dutz wrote:
Possibly worth discussing if it’s easier to port to Git and do that then
… or if better done in SVN … I guess the final discussion Git vs. SVN
still needs to formally be done, right?
Chris
*Von: *Cédric Damioli <cdami...@apache.org>
*Datum: *Dienstag, 23. Januar 2024 um 17:30
*An: *dev@cocoon.apache.org <dev@cocoon.apache.org>
*Betreff: *Re: AW: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x
+1
Cédric
Le 23/01/2024 à 17:25, Christofer Dutz a écrit :
Yeah … I also think that possibly making them read-only (and
additionally prefixing them with a “retired/” prefix should be enough.
Chris
