Cool. I'll get those taken care of for RC1. Thanks!

On 9/14/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/14/07, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > After a lot of work and even more missed time, I think email has
> progressed
> > to the point where work on a release may begin. All recently reported
> bugs,
> > aside from one enhancement that would require nontrivial rewriting, are
> > closed, and I think it's time to get the work done since 1.0 into users'
> > hands.
> >
> > I hereby volunteer to get the release moving if no one objects --
> hopefully
> > to start next Monday or Tuesday and have an RC1 for votes by the end of
> next
> > week.
>
> +1
>
> > You can also find my feeble attempt at a release plan on the wiki page
> for
> > email.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Rather than wait for the RC - thought I have a quick look in advance:
>
> 1) NOTICE file
> I've updated the copyright year in the NOTICE file to 2007
>
> 2) CLIRR
> IMO would be good to run a CLIRR report for changes between 1.0 and
> 1.1 when you produce the RC - its helpful so that anyone
> reviewing/voting on the RC can be satisfied whether this release is
> binary compatible with the 1.0 release.
>
> 3) Release Notes
> Release notes need to be done for 1.1 (RELEASE-NOTES.txt still
> reflects 1.0). As well as changes, a statement on compatibility with
> the previous release would be good - also I'm guessing that the
> minimum java version has changed from JDK 1.3 to JDK 1.4 in this
> release - if that is the case then it would also be good to state that
> in the release notes.
>
> 4) Building Page
> The building page on the Email site still reflects maven1 and needs to
> be updated for maven 2
>
> Other than that looks in pretty good shape to me.
>
> Niall
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to