That settles it for me. Do we need to put LICENSE/NOTICE in META-INF in source and javadoc or is the root directory acceptable?
On 9/24/07, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ben Speakmon wrote: > > I wasn't sure what to make of it either; the release docs don't mention > it > > specifically. The source and javadoc jars, BTW, are intended to be > deployed > > next to the final build in the maven repo. It won't be hard to make sure > > they get in there. Is there a consensus that it's required for this > release? > > > > I don't have an official reference either, but I remember votes that > were canceled because of this. Here is an example for that I found in > the archives [1]. > > Oliver > > [1] > > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--3rd-attempt:-Release-commons-io-1.3.2-t3880798.html > > > On 9/24/07, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Everything looks good, except for one thing, which I think needs to be > >> fixed: the jar with the javadocs does not contain NOTICE.txt and > >> LICENSE.txt. (The jar with the sources contains these files, but they > >> are stored in the top level rather than in META-INF; don't know whether > >> this is problematic.) > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
