Sure. I'd like to hear more about the use cases that demonstrate the need
for the components. (Some kind of commons-collections that uses j.u.c would
be interesting, for example, since that comes up a lot.)

On 10/3/07, Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Right. Such a component would contain evertything that is NOT in
> j.u.c., but still useful. This means it, it would be an addtion, not a
> replacement for j.u.c.
>
> What could be useful, but is not in j.u.c is subject to discussion.
> This might be stuff that is  NOT YET in j.u.c because exisiting
> solution do not have the quality to go there, yet. Or the scope of the
> code is more than general than what is inside j.u.c
>
> Examples for category I (not mature enough) might be the lock manager
> I was talking about. Category II (broader scope) might be the lock
> implementation that is geared towards resource locking. Or maybe more
> concurrent collections. Or pther special lock implementations. Or
> locks with deadlock detections (like in commons transaction).
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> Oliver
>
> 2007/10/3, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > My ears prick up at any mention of concurrency!
> >
> > What's the scope of this, though? With Doug Lea's library, the
> > util.concurrent backport, and the JDK 5+ built-ins, what else is needed?
> >
> > On 10/3/07, Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Folks!
> > >
> > > I was wondering if anyone would be interested in a component for
> > > classes that help you with concurrent programming. An initial
> > > contribution could be the locking manager including Lock
> > > implementations.
> > >
> > > Anyone?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to